Painful Palin
It looks like it's about time for some politics to surface here again. After hearing the substance and the optimism in Biden and Obama's speeches last week, Sarah Palin's speech was a miserable experience to behold. After spending the first significant portion dwelling on family minutiae to "introduce herself" followed by a laundry list of lines to perk the ears of different elements of the Republican base, Palin launched into an unapologetically vicious attack on Obama. The attacks were roughly half and half personal and issue-oriented. The personal attacks were many and varied. For instance, she managed to discount Obama's community organizing days in an acidic and mocking manner with a blase dismissal of anyone involved in such an undertaking. The issue-oriented attacks largely seemed half-truths phrased to blacken or distort Obama's intent. One example of this is how she talked about Obama wanting to raise a number of taxes...but she failed to point out that those will be raised for a small, wealthy percentage of the population while the overwhelming rest of us can anticipate decreases.
Most of this was to be expected. Palin certainly held her own as far as speaking and established herself as the Republican attack-dog. She accomplished well what was set out by the McCain campaign and the Republican party and she seemingly relished responding forcefully to the media storm last week. However, one can't help but feel that palpable difference in tone and message between the Democrats and Republicans this year. One side has ideas, optimism, and positive energy, the other side has energy to attack these things. I know the anger and excitement is high on the other side for the moment, but I can't help but think this will backfire in the end.
I'm an independent voter who will side with the better campaign and the better message. This year's contest is so starkly one-sided. She may have fired-up the Republican base, but she's going to fire up Obama's supporters even more. I'm donating as we speak.
2 comments:
One more inaccuracy in her speech - the whole bragging about the "bridge to nowhere" and not hiring lobbyists...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/03/politics/animal/main4412098.shtml
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,2482434.story
Maybe it's ok to lie in front of millions, as long as your wearing lipstick while doing it.
I need to shower after watching that speech. And then vomit.
Another blatant lie on her part -
Palin cast Obama as "a man who has written two memoirs but not a single major law or even a reform."
Um, records from the Library of Congress would beg to differ.
(http://thomas.loc.gov, search for Obama under Bills/Resolutions and you'll find 152 he sponsored/co-wrote.)
This includes the major Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act he helped pass in 2007. Seems like he was doing more on the Senate bench then working on his memoir.
I'm monopolizing your blog space, but I'm fired up. I hope anybody who watched the 2 conventions and realized how much more divisive, nasty and substance-devoid the RNC 's was - will be fired up as well. I understand how important it is to hear the other side's talking points and issues - but cheap, ad-hominem attacks certainly don't qualify. Stewie Griffith said it the best: "It degrades us all."
And seriously, is there a spell-check function on this thing.
Post a Comment